Checklist for Identifying Durable Competitive Advantages
Step-by-step checklist to identify durable competitive advantages—cost, brand, network effects, switching costs, efficient processes, plus finance and management metrics.
When investing in a company, the key to long-term success lies in identifying businesses with durable competitive advantages, also known as economic moats. These advantages protect companies from competition and ensure steady profitability over time. Here’s a quick breakdown of the five main types of durable competitive advantages:
Cost Advantages: Companies like Walmart leverage economies of scale and operational efficiency to maintain low costs and strong margins.
Intangible Assets: Brands like Coca-Cola use trademarks, brand loyalty, and intellectual property to charge premium prices and retain customers.
Network Effects: Platforms like Facebook become more valuable as more users join, creating a self-reinforcing cycle that competitors struggle to disrupt.
Switching Costs: High barriers, like retraining or integration costs, make it hard for customers to leave companies such as American Express.
Efficient Processes: Businesses like Tesla optimize operations and reinvest in innovation to stay ahead.
A strong business model, market position, financial health, and capable management are also critical. Focus on metrics like Return on Capital Employed (ROCE), free cash flow, and consistent earnings growth to evaluate a company’s financial strength. Management’s ability to allocate capital wisely and maintain focus on core strengths further reinforces a company’s edge.
This checklist helps investors systematically evaluate companies, ensuring a disciplined approach to finding businesses with enduring competitive advantages.
Warren Buffett: How to Identify Superior Stocks (Moats)
5 Types of Durable Competitive Advantages
Competitive advantages come in various forms, but not all are built to last. By understanding the five main types, you can distinguish companies with enduring strengths from those merely riding short-term trends. Let’s break them down.
Cost Advantages
Some companies manage to produce or deliver goods at lower costs than their rivals while staying profitable. This edge often comes from operational efficiency, economies of scale, or access to cheaper resources - not fleeting market conditions.
To spot genuine cost advantages, look for declining per-unit costs as production ramps up. This signals economies of scale are at play. Companies with efficient supply chains, expanding production capacity, and strong supplier relationships tend to stand out. Comparing gross and operating margins against competitors can also reveal whether the company’s cost advantage is real and growing over time.
Take Walmart, for example. Its global supply chain and procurement practices allow it to keep prices low while staying profitable. Walmart’s massive scale gives it unmatched leverage with suppliers, and as the company grows, its cost advantage only strengthens. This is a prime example of a durable competitive edge.
If a company claims cost advantages but shows flat or shrinking margins as revenue grows, it’s worth questioning whether the advantage is more myth than reality.
Intangible Assets
Intangible assets like intellectual property, brand recognition, and proprietary technology create barriers that competitors struggle to overcome. These assets often allow companies to charge premium prices without losing customers.
Brands, in particular, can be incredibly powerful. Coca-Cola, for instance, relies on its iconic brand name and trademark protection to maintain its market dominance. Unlike patents, which expire, trademarks can last indefinitely, offering Coca-Cola a long-term edge. This brand loyalty lets the company charge premium prices while keeping its leadership in the global beverage market.
When evaluating intangible assets, ask yourself: Do customers actively seek out this brand, or do they see the product as interchangeable with others? Companies with strong intangible assets often demonstrate pricing power and customer loyalty. Even strategic locations can serve as unique intangible assets that competitors can’t easily replicate.
Network Effects
Network effects occur when a product or service becomes more valuable as more people use it. This creates a self-reinforcing cycle that strengthens the company’s position over time.
Each new user adds value to the platform, attracting even more users. This creates a “flywheel effect” that’s tough for competitors to disrupt. For example, a new social network, no matter how impressive, struggles to compete with an established platform where everyone is already connected.
To confirm the presence of network effects, look for accelerating user growth, strong retention rates, and improving unit economics. Companies with true network effects often see customer acquisition costs decline relative to lifetime value as they scale. High switching costs tied to network participation - like accumulated connections or data - further solidify the company’s advantage.
Switching Costs
Switching costs refer to the barriers that make it hard for customers to leave for a competitor. These costs can take many forms, but they all make customers hesitate before jumping ship.
In software, switching costs might include the complexity of integration or the need for employee retraining. In financial services, they could involve account consolidation or regulatory hurdles. For telecommunications, long-term contracts and service portability challenges come into play.
Take American Express as an example. Its integrated rewards program and global merchant network create high switching costs, making it hard for customers to leave without losing significant benefits.
To evaluate switching costs, look at churn rates and retention metrics. Companies with strong switching costs often enjoy pricing power - they can raise prices without losing customers. Assess how much time, money, or effort it would take for customers to switch to a competitor. If the disruption is significant, the company likely has a strong advantage in this area.
Efficient Processes and Superior Service
Operational efficiency and top-notch service can give companies a lasting edge, especially when these advantages are deeply rooted in company culture, expertise, or proprietary systems. While processes might seem easy to copy, truly superior operations often take years to perfect.
Continuous improvement is key. Tesla, for example, consistently reinvests in battery technology and autonomous driving, maintaining its lead in innovation and efficiency.
Companies with process advantages often show better operational metrics than their competitors. Look for signs like higher inventory turnover, faster delivery times, lower defect rates, or exceptional customer satisfaction scores. These metrics should hold steady across different economic conditions.
The strongest companies reinvest in their processes to stay ahead. This ongoing commitment separates temporary operational wins from durable advantages. When analyzing process advantages, consider whether they stem from easily replicable best practices or unique capabilities tied to the company’s culture or expertise. The latter often signals a more enduring competitive edge.
Analyzing Business Model and Market Position
When evaluating a company, it’s crucial to determine if its strengths can withstand competition and adapt to market changes. This means digging into its business model, market position, and any vulnerabilities that could chip away at its value over time.
Business Focus and Consistency
The most resilient companies tend to have a clear focus, disciplined capital use, and a commitment to their core mission. They excel by sticking to what they do best, avoiding distractions that might lead them into unfamiliar or risky territory.
Companies that have operated a focused and leading core business for decades often demonstrate this discipline. Their longevity isn’t accidental - it reflects leadership that knows what works and avoids impulsive decisions. Instead of dramatic shifts, these companies evolve steadily, ensuring their growth doesn’t come at the cost of stability. For instance, Patagonia has stayed true to its values by prioritizing sustainability and outdoor gear in every decision it makes. Similarly, Tesla concentrated on electric vehicles with a luxury edge, avoiding the temptation to compete across the entire automotive market. This focus allowed Tesla to build expertise and scale before exploring related opportunities.
To assess a company’s consistency, review its annual reports and earnings calls over several years. Does the leadership stick to its stated goals, or are they frequently swayed by short-term trends? Consistent strategic discipline often points to stronger competitive advantages. Watch out for warning signs like overly aggressive expansion or low-quality acquisitions, which can indicate attempts to artificially boost growth instead of earning it through genuine strength.
Market Defensibility and Disruption Resistance
Even a company with strong advantages today can falter if its market is vulnerable to disruption. A key question to ask is whether the company operates in a market that is expected to grow steadily and has built-in defenses against competition.
Markets with high entry barriers - like economies of scale or proprietary technology - tend to offer better protection for leaders. Additionally, when customers face significant switching costs or inconvenience, it makes these markets even more defensible.
Technological disruption is another major factor to consider. Companies that consistently innovate to stay ahead of potential disruptors are generally better equipped to handle market shifts. Nvidia provides a great example: it has expanded its expertise beyond GPUs into areas like healthcare, autonomous driving, and cloud computing, leveraging advancements in AI and machine learning. This diversification not only strengthens its position but also helps it adapt as the market evolves.
Look at how a company has responded to past technological threats. Companies that view challenges as opportunities often come out stronger. Tesla’s vertical integration strategy, particularly its in-house battery production through its Gigafactory, highlights how controlling critical technology can enhance disruption resistance and reduce dependency on external suppliers.
Lastly, evaluate whether the company’s core market is relatively insulated from heavy regulatory risks or volatile commodity prices. Companies operating in stable markets tend to have a better chance of maintaining their competitive edge.
Regulatory and Concentration Risks
Even the strongest competitive advantages can be undermined by shifting regulations or over-reliance on a limited set of customers or suppliers.
Regulations can either protect or threaten a company’s position. For example, industries with high regulatory barriers, such as licensing or strict approval processes, often enjoy protection from new competitors. However, regulatory changes can also erode these advantages. For instance, companies with high carbon footprints might face challenges due to environmental regulations, while businesses like Tesla or Patagonia, which emphasize sustainability, could benefit from such changes.
To assess regulatory risks, review the company’s 10-K filings. Firms with operations spread across multiple regions and a proactive approach to compliance generally face lower regulatory risks than those concentrated in a single jurisdiction.
Customer concentration is another potential vulnerability. If a single customer or a small group accounts for a large portion of revenue, losing that customer could have a significant impact. Examining 10-K filings for disclosures about customers contributing more than 10% of revenue can help identify this risk. A diversified customer base, on the other hand, signals a more stable advantage.
Supplier dependence poses similar risks. Relying heavily on one supplier can lead to disruptions or higher costs. Tesla mitigates this issue through vertical integration and in-house battery production, reducing its reliance on external suppliers.
Diversification across customers, suppliers, and key relationships can help reduce concentration risk. Long-term contracts with major partners also add stability. Additionally, companies with revenue heavily concentrated in one region or dependent on a single product face extra risks. Firms with minimal debt are generally better positioned to weather disruptions, while high debt levels can make them more vulnerable.
This detailed look at business models lays the groundwork for assessing a company’s financial strength.
Evaluating Financial Strength
Once you’ve assessed a company’s business model and market position, the next step is to dive into its financial metrics. These numbers don’t just tell the story of past success - they reveal whether the company has the resources to keep reinvesting in its strengths and delivering value to its shareholders.
Return on Equity (ROE) and Return on Capital Employed (ROCE)
Two key metrics to evaluate are Return on Equity (ROE) and Return on Capital Employed (ROCE). ROE measures how effectively a company generates profit from shareholders’ equity, while ROCE looks at returns on all capital invested, including debt. However, keep in mind that ROE can be artificially inflated by high levels of borrowing, making ROCE a better indicator of true operational efficiency.
Companies with consistently high ROCE - typically above 15% over several years - stand out for their pricing power and operational excellence, traits that are difficult for competitors to replicate. For instance, Amazon’s dominance in logistics and Google’s strength in search are examples of businesses with high ROCE. By tracking these metrics over a 5–10 year period, you can confirm whether a company’s performance is sustainable. The goal is to identify businesses with enduring competitive advantages that lead to strong, consistent returns on capital.
Earnings Growth and Stability
Earnings growth is another important factor, but not all growth is created equal. True growth driven by competitive advantages shows consistency across economic cycles. To verify this, compare net income with operating cash flow - this ensures the earnings are backed by real profitability.
During economic downturns, companies with strong competitive positions - such as Walmart, which benefits from efficient operations and strong supplier relationships - often maintain profitability or experience only modest declines compared to their peers. Sustainable growth also shows up in key metrics like revenue, dividends, and capital employed per share, which should ideally grow faster than inflation over a 10-year period. For example, growth above 2% per year, with a quality score of over 75%, and without extended periods of decline (more than four consecutive years) signals a durable advantage.
Free Cash Flow and Dividend Sustainability
Financial strength also hinges on a company’s ability to generate free cash flow (FCF) - the cash left after covering operating expenses and capital investments. FCF is critical because it funds reinvestment, dividend payments, and debt reduction. A strong business typically converts 10–20% of its revenue into free cash flow, which not only supports growth but also provides a cushion during recessions. Key metrics to monitor include the FCF margin (FCF as a percentage of revenue), the growth of FCF compared to earnings, and the ratio of FCF to net income. Companies like Starbucks and Netflix showcase their competitive edge by generating substantial free cash flow, which allows them to reinvest in their businesses while rewarding shareholders.
Dividend sustainability is another important indicator of financial health. A healthy payout ratio - 30–60% of earnings or 50–75% of free cash flow - strikes a balance between rewarding shareholders and retaining enough cash for reinvestment. Red flags include payout ratios exceeding 100%, declining free cash flow while dividends remain unchanged or increase, and rising debt levels to fund dividends. Companies that have consistently raised dividends over a decade or more, even during tough industry conditions, often signal a durable competitive advantage.
Research spanning decades shows that businesses with sustainable competitive advantages and steady free cash flow generation create long-term value. While short-term gains from stock price increases can be appealing, it’s the companies with strong fundamentals and a focus on reinvesting in their competitive strengths that deliver lasting returns. The best firms prioritize long-term growth over risky expansions or poorly thought-out acquisitions, ensuring they remain leaders in their industries.
Assessing Management and Capital Allocation
Financial metrics can show you what a company has achieved, but the quality of its management determines whether those achievements can continue. Leadership decisions - especially around capital deployment and handling challenges - play a critical role in maintaining and strengthening competitive advantages over time.
Management Track Record and Vision
A management team’s past decisions offer valuable insight into whether they prioritize long-term shareholder value over chasing short-term gains. Warren Buffett famously includes “competent and reliable management” as one of his four key filters for evaluating investment opportunities.
One way to assess this is by looking at how management approaches growth. Companies with strong competitive advantages often grow cautiously, avoiding reckless expansion or poorly thought-out acquisitions. When acquisitions are part of the strategy, it’s important to evaluate whether they complement the company’s existing strengths or if they represent unfocused diversification that could dilute shareholder value.
Another critical factor is how clearly management can explain the company’s competitive advantages. Leaders who articulate what drives their business and how their decisions strengthen those advantages demonstrate solid strategic thinking. On the flip side, vague or constantly shifting explanations may point to a lack of vision. The best management teams continuously reinvest and adapt to market changes while staying true to the company’s core strengths. Companies that evolve to stay ahead of competition while preserving their foundation show exceptional leadership. This clarity and adaptability lay the groundwork for evaluating how effectively management allocates capital.
Capital Allocation and Shareholder Returns
How management allocates capital can either strengthen or weaken a company’s competitive edge. Effective capital allocation typically involves disciplined reinvestment in core business areas. Companies with enduring advantages often channel resources into initiatives that deepen their moat - like proprietary technology, supply chain improvements, or brand development. For example, Tesla’s vertical integration strategy, particularly its Gigafactory initiative, showcases this approach. By focusing on battery production, Tesla significantly reduced manufacturing costs through economies of scale and waste reduction, enabling it to outpace competitors in both quantity and quality of battery production.
Several financial metrics can help gauge whether capital is being allocated effectively. If Return on Equity (ROE) or Return on Capital Employed (ROCE) declines despite ongoing investments, it may signal inefficiency. Monitoring Free Cash Flow (FCF) relative to capital expenditures can also reveal whether investments are starting to pay off. Comparing a company’s capital intensity - measured as capital expenditures as a percentage of revenue - with competitors can provide further insights. Additionally, stable or improving trends in Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) during periods of reinvestment often indicate that competitive advantages are being reinforced.
Balancing shareholder returns through dividends and buybacks with reinvestment in the business is another hallmark of effective management. A red flag arises when companies prioritize share buybacks or special dividends at the expense of necessary reinvestment. Research spanning decades has shown that firms with durable competitive advantages create consistent value, which correlates with long-term stock price growth. The strongest companies reinvest strategically to protect their advantages and seize new opportunities before competitors can disrupt them. Maintaining fiscal discipline during times of abundant capital further underscores a management team’s skill in allocating resources wisely.
Crisis Management and Response
A company’s response to crises reveals a lot about its leadership’s ability to safeguard competitive advantages under pressure. When evaluating a company’s history, focus on how it has navigated industry disruptions, economic downturns, or competitive threats. Look for examples where strategic decisions - like maintaining investments in research and development or product quality - helped preserve or even enhance the company’s moat.
Strong cash flow is often a critical factor in weathering crises. Companies that emerge from tough times with their competitive advantages intact - or even stronger - tend to have management teams adept at turning challenges into opportunities. For instance, leaders who invest in innovation or make strategic acquisitions during downturns often demonstrate superior crisis management.
On the other hand, warning signs include declining investments in innovation, reductions in product or service quality, and cost-cutting measures that undermine areas critical to sustaining competitive advantages. High executive turnover or the departure of key leaders may also indicate internal disagreements over strategy. Additionally, an overreliance on financial engineering - such as excessive debt restructuring or accounting maneuvers - can signal that management is prioritizing short-term results over long-term value creation.
Resilient management not only protects a company’s competitive edge but also sets it on a path for sustained growth. The key is distinguishing between temporary gains - like stock price surges from short-term measures - and genuine value creation driven by durable competitive advantages and strong cash flow. Management teams that grasp this distinction and act accordingly are best equipped to maintain their company’s strengths through all market conditions.
How to Use This Checklist
This checklist becomes most effective when tailored to fit your specific investment strategy. Instead of treating every criterion as equally important, focus on the factors that align with your goals and risk tolerance for better results.
Prioritizing Checklist Criteria
Your investment style should guide how much weight you assign to each checklist item. Growth-oriented and value-focused investors naturally prioritize different aspects of a company’s competitive edge because their goals differ.
If you’re targeting growth investments, emphasize innovation, market expansion potential, and management’s vision for future opportunities. For example, Apple’s ongoing product evolution and ecosystem development highlight this approach. When analyzing growth candidates, pay attention to research and development efforts and product pipelines. Look for signs that management is reinvesting to strengthen long-term advantages rather than focusing on short-term profits.
On the other hand, value investors should prioritize cost efficiency, operational stability, and consistent cash flows. Walmart exemplifies this strategy by leveraging supply chain efficiencies and bulk purchasing power to maintain low costs and steady returns. For value investments, focus on earnings stability and free cash flow, rather than aggressive growth plans. Dividend yield and financial strength may also play a bigger role in your evaluation.
Companies excel in different areas depending on their business models. Research indicates that combining a reasonable valuation with at least one strong quality factor - like durable competitive advantages, a solid market position, or steady growth - often yields better results than seeking perfection across all metrics. Adjust your checklist to reflect your portfolio goals, whether you’re prioritizing income, growth, or capital preservation.
Consider creating a weighted scoring system where the criteria that align most closely with your investment thesis carry more weight. This approach allows you to compare companies systematically within your chosen framework and make more objective decisions. Use these prioritized criteria to guide your detailed analysis in the next steps.
Integrating the Checklist into Research
Once you’ve prioritized your criteria, follow a structured research process to maintain objectivity. A step-by-step approach ensures you capture key insights for each criterion and fosters consistency across your evaluations.
Start with an analysis of the business model. Clearly define the company’s competitive advantage and how it defends that position. Document specific examples: for cost advantages, identify supply chain efficiencies; for intangible assets, assess brand strength and customer loyalty; and for network effects, examine user growth and engagement metrics. Next, review financial data from the past 5-10 years to identify trends in profitability, cash flow, and market position. Look for growth rates exceeding 2% annually for revenues, capital employed, and dividends per share - these figures align with inflation targets and signal real value creation. Ensure growth quality is strong, avoiding companies with prolonged declines in revenue or earnings exceeding four years.
Evaluate management quality by reviewing shareholder letters, earnings call transcripts, and capital allocation decisions. For instance, Amazon’s reinvestment in logistics infrastructure and AWS development showcases effective capital allocation. Focus on whether management reinvests in long-term growth rather than short-term gains.
Develop a scoring system where each criterion is rated (e.g., strong, moderate, weak), and calculate an overall competitive advantage score. This method reinforces a thorough evaluation of competitive advantages. Keep your documentation updated quarterly as new financial results and market conditions emerge. This repeatable process helps you objectively compare companies and track how your assessments evolve over time.
Stick to sectors you understand. Avoid investing in trendy industries just because they’re popular. Focus on business models you can analyze confidently, rather than venturing into unfamiliar territory.
Balancing Risk and Reward
After assessing the key metrics, weigh the strengths of a company against the risks of market disruptions. Evaluating both the durability of competitive advantages and the likelihood of disruption helps you balance potential returns with risks. For example, Coca-Cola’s brand equity and distribution network have remained resilient for decades, justifying premium valuations despite slower growth. However, even well-established advantages are not immune to disruption, so it’s vital to assess potential threats.
Analyze industry trends, technological advancements, and competitive pressures to evaluate disruption risks. Tesla, for instance, faces increasing competition from traditional automakers. To assess its staying power, consider whether Tesla’s battery technology and manufacturing efficiency can sustain its leadership position. Also, examine a company’s ability to adapt - Google’s expansion from search into cloud computing and other ventures demonstrates how leveraging competitive advantages can reduce disruption risks.
Studies over decades show that competitive advantages often correlate with value creation, which in turn influences long-term stock price growth. However, it’s important to distinguish between historical advantages and those that can endure under market stress.
To quantify the risk-reward balance, compare valuation multiples to the durability of competitive advantages. A company with a decade-long proven advantage might justify a higher price-to-earnings ratio than one with a shorter track record. Additionally, consider regulatory and market concentration risks; companies reliant on single markets or facing regulatory scrutiny carry higher disruption risks, even if their current advantages are strong.
The best investments strike a balance between reasonable valuation and the strength and durability of competitive advantages. Avoid overpaying for advantages that seem vulnerable to disruption, but don’t demand such a large margin of safety that you miss quality opportunities. For instance, Patagonia’s commitment to environmental sustainability has created a loyal customer base willing to pay premium prices, yet such advantages may be undervalued by markets focused on short-term metrics.
Don’t rely solely on multiple expansion for returns. Instead, prioritize companies with durable competitive advantages and strong cash flow generation. Look for firms with predictable cash flows, as they tend to weather recessions better and fund growth without excessive debt. Companies that consistently reinvest in their competitive advantages and innovate to stay ahead of competition are critical to consider when evaluating long-term durability.
Conclusion
Identifying durable competitive advantages is key to separating successful long-term investments from risky speculation. Research shows a direct link between these advantages and a company’s ability to create value, which, in turn, drives sustained stock price growth over time. Without such strengths, companies often struggle to protect their market share, sustain profitability, and generate the cash flow needed to reward shareholders.
This checklist transforms abstract concepts into measurable criteria, offering a systematic and impartial way to evaluate potential investments. By applying consistent standards - such as cost advantages, intangible assets, network effects, switching costs, and operational efficiency - you can assess business models, financial health, and management quality in a structured way. This disciplined approach bridges strategic analysis with practical decision-making, increasing the likelihood of long-term success.
Thriving companies not only preserve their advantages but also adapt by investing in innovation and addressing emerging threats. Take Mastercard, for example: the company reinvests its significant cash flow into developing new payment technologies and expanding non-cash transaction methods. This proactive strategy strengthens its competitive position rather than allowing it to erode.
Focus on businesses with reliable, predictable cash flows - these firms tend to weather economic downturns better and can fund growth without relying heavily on debt. Stick to industries you understand deeply, and avoid chasing trends in sectors where you lack clarity or expertise.
The true power of this checklist lies in regularly reviewing past investment decisions against its criteria. This habit helps uncover patterns in both successes and missteps, sharpening your ability to differentiate between fading advantages and enduring strengths.
As shown, a disciplined checklist is the backbone of any strong investment strategy. Use it to evaluate every opportunity and build a portfolio centered on companies with durable advantages, setting the stage for long-term growth.
FAQs
How can I tell if a company’s cost advantage will last over time?
To figure out if a company’s cost advantage can stand the test of time, focus on whether it’s built on factors that competitors will find tough to duplicate. Key elements to watch for include economies of scale, exclusive access to low-cost resources, or proprietary technology that enhances efficiency over the long haul. These types of advantages tend to hold up better than cost savings driven by market shifts or short-lived strategies.
It’s also worth examining how the company has upheld its cost advantage in the past and whether it has a solid plan to safeguard it moving forward. A proven history of steady performance often points to a more lasting competitive strength.
What key financial metrics can help identify a company’s sustainable competitive advantage?
To evaluate whether a company has a lasting competitive edge, it’s essential to dig into financial metrics that highlight its ability to consistently beat competitors and stay profitable. Here are three key indicators to watch:
High Gross Margins: Companies with an edge often show higher gross margins. This reflects their ability to price effectively and run operations efficiently - both signs of strength in their market.
Return on Equity (ROE): A consistently strong ROE, especially when compared to industry peers, points to skilled management and a business model built to last.
Free Cash Flow (FCF): Positive and steadily increasing free cash flow signals financial stability. It also shows the company’s capacity to reinvest in growth or reward shareholders.
Tracking these metrics over time gives you a clearer picture of whether a company has what it takes to maintain its position in the market.
How do capital allocation decisions by management influence a company’s long-term competitive advantage?
Management’s decisions on how to allocate capital are a cornerstone of a company’s ability to sustain its competitive edge over the long haul. Smart investments in areas like research and development, marketing, or strategic acquisitions can bolster a company’s market position and help it stay ahead of the competition.
However, missteps in allocation - like overspending on projects with minimal impact or ignoring key parts of the business - can weaken that advantage. Investors should seek out leadership teams with a history of making thoughtful, value-focused choices that emphasize steady growth and delivering returns to shareholders.